Mon premier blog

Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler Edward G. Nilges
Publisher: Apress

The advantage of compiled code is that execution is quite fast but on the other hand it takes a significant time to compile the code. NET Framework provides a run-time environment called the Common Language Runtime, which manages the execution of code and provides services that make the development process easier. This book is also pretty good 'Build Your Own .Net Language and Compiler' http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591348/qid%3D1138881654/203-8687125-0675116. Say we wanted to build a feature like require , which is known in many scripting languages, in Scala. Nilges, Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler ISBN: 1590591348 | edition 2004 | CHM | 388 pages | 9 mb This practical book presents. The biggest challenge with developers writing their own parser is that building a parser is quite complicated and requires a lot of coding effort. Unfortunately, most texts on language and compiler development are hard to digest, written from academic platforms for use in college-level computer science programs. Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler by Edward G. TypeScript is a programming language that makes it easier to write cross-platform, application scale, JavaScript that runs in any browser or in any host. He discusses a high level concept of a compiler and proceeds to invent his own langauge for the . I am looking into the same concept, and found this promising article by Joel Pobar,. A goal of the Mono project is to build a "build your own framework" platform where you can use Mono+your app as an "appliance", dynamically reshaping not just assemblies but also the VM itself. They can parse expressions in all the .NET languages and generate IL code. Microsoft's own build tool – if you're using visual studio, you're already using MSBuild. URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0k6kkbsd.aspx. All this is for counting everything anyone writes that could be called a compiler; the most popular mainstream language implementations may very well be focused on C implementation, but that doesn't mean the people who chose C for them knew what they were doing. Create a Language Compiler for the .NET Framework. Microsoft So I'm not surprised that he's trying to build something on top of JavaScript to make himself comfortable, after having been given the direction of building JavaScript tooling. The advantage of using Instead of building a custom parser, another alternative is using the .NET compilers. I am not sure about the other JS compilers, but as for the comparison of TrueScript to DARTwell, DART's goal is to replace JS.